Skip to content
For Investors and Strategic Partners

The bank that performs the banking.

For every dollar spent on banking software, six dollars are spent on banking services. QNTM is being built to replace the services layer for regional banks through an agent-operated, dual-rail operating model.

4,500+
US community banks under $10B AUM
FDIC Q4 2024
55-65%
Average operating ratio
Industry benchmark
$6
Spent on services per $1 on software
McKinsey, 2023
0
Banks built for dual-rail from day one
Greenfield opportunity

Autopilot banking, not copilot tools

Copilot vendors sell productivity tools to bank employees. QNTM is being built to perform the repetitive work directly: compliance screening, settlement orchestration, treasury optimisation, and continuous reporting under structured governance.

hub

Network operator, not software vendor

QNTM performs banking back-office work for partner banks rather than selling them tools to do it themselves. Revenue comes from shared operating savings and transaction throughput, not licence fees.

handshake

OYO model applied to banking

The partner bank keeps the licence, charter, clients, capital, and brand. QNTM provides the operating layer: compliance, settlement, treasury orchestration, and continuous reporting.

compare_arrows

Dual-rail architecture

Fiat and stablecoin settlement designed as one balance-sheet reality from day one. Policy-driven routing across both rails with pre-settlement compliance and continuous evidence.

security

Agent-operated, human-governed

Multi-Agent Consensus means no single agent can execute alone. Material transactions and threshold events route to named human officers. Governance is structural, not procedural.

Revenue aligned with operating savings

Revenue per bank

  • arrow_forwardOperating-layer fee: basis points on transaction volume processed
  • arrow_forwardTreasury yield share: percentage of optimisation upside above benchmark
  • arrow_forwardCompliance-as-a-service: fixed monthly for continuous examination readiness

Target unit economics

  • arrow_forwardOperating ratio target: <22% (vs. 55-65% industry)
  • arrow_forwardDesign target: 5 humans per $1B AUM under management
  • arrow_forwardMarginal cost per additional bank decreases as network data compounds

Network compounding

  • arrow_forwardMore banks generate more transaction data
  • arrow_forwardMore data improves compliance intelligence and risk models
  • arrow_forwardBetter intelligence lowers cost per bank
  • arrow_forwardLower cost attracts more banks. The loop is structural.

Why the window is open now

Three structural changes converged in 2025-2026 that make this model possible for the first time. None of them existed three years ago.

Stablecoin regulation is arriving

The GENIUS Act and MiCA are creating the first clear regulatory perimeters for payment stablecoins within the banking system. This is not speculative anymore.

AI crossed the reasoning threshold

Large language models can now perform multi-step financial reasoning, compliance screening, and structured evidence generation at a quality level that was impossible 18 months ago.

Regional banks face an existential cost problem

Compliance costs scale linearly with headcount while margins compress. The current operating model is not sustainable for banks under $5B AUM without structural change.

No one is building the operating layer

Every competitor is either selling copilot tools (productivity), building neobanks (competition), or running crypto exchanges (speculation). No one is building the autopilot that does the back-office work for existing banks.

Licensing path and jurisdictional sequence

QNTM is pursuing UK PRA + FCA primary licensing on a staged authorisation pathway. Phase 1 is foundational build (pre-application engagement). Phase 2 targets Authorisation With Restrictions and UK production launch. Phase 3 closes federated network onboarding. Multi-jurisdiction expansion is considered only after UK steady state.

JurisdictionEntity / LicenceStatusTarget
United KingdomPRA + FCA pre-application engagementPhase 1 Founding Round active — GBP 20M at GBP 120M pre-money2026 (Phase 1 — Foundational Build)
United KingdomFormal application — banking authorisationPhase 1 deliverable2027
United KingdomAuthorisation With Restrictions (AWR) + UK launchPhase 2 milestone2028 (Phase 2 — Authorisation With Restrictions + UK launch)
United KingdomFull authorisation + federated networkPhase 3 milestone2029 / 2030 (Phase 3 — Federated Network onboarding)
Domainqntm.bank fTLD activationPost-FCA banking licencePost-FCA banking licence — qntm.bank domain activates

Where we are and what comes next

Done
  • check_circleBilateral MoU signed (Hubert + Yves, 2026-04-29)
  • check_circlePhase 1 cap table locked at GBP 120M pre-money
  • check_circleArchitecture Blueprint v2.1 + Technical Architecture Document drafted
  • check_circleqntm.financial domain registered (2026-04-30)
Phase 1 — 2026
  • check_circleUK incorporation
  • check_circlePRA + FCA pre-application engagement
  • check_circleICAAP / ILAAP development
  • check_circleSMF candidate cultivation
  • check_circleGBP 20M founding round close
Phase 2 — 2027 / 2028
  • check_circleFormal application submitted
  • check_circleAWR grant target
  • check_circleUK production launch on regulated rails
  • check_circleFull ICAAP / ILAAP submission
  • check_circleGBP 20M Phase 2 raise (milestone-linked valuation)
Phase 3 — 2029 / 2030
  • check_circleRestrictions lifted
  • check_circleFederated network onboarding stage
  • check_circleqntm.bank domain activated post-FCA banking licence
  • check_circleGBP 20M Phase 3 raise (milestone-linked valuation)

Indicative use of proceeds

The seed round is designed to take QNTM from architecture to first deployment: build the core operating layer, submit the EMI application, and sign the first partner bank.

1.
Programme governance + operating cadence
Project launch, founder team operating cadence, programme governance
2.
Technology build + hardening
QNTM control stack, dual-rail platform, agentic interface engineering
3.
Regulatory preparation + PRA/FCA engagement
Pre-application dialogue, ICAAP / ILAAP development, regulatory references
4.
UK licence application
Formal application package, including ICAAP / ILAAP submission scaffolding
5.
Institutional proof pack
Architecture Blueprint v2.1, Technical Architecture Document, Regulatory Business Plan
6.
Senior team + SMF candidate development
SMF1 / SMF2 / SMF14 / SMF16 / SMF17 / SMF24 / SMF27 candidate cultivation
7.
Vendor selection + RFP completion
Core platform validation, integration partners, regulated infrastructure procurement
8.
Working capital + contingency
Operational runway through Phase 2 application window

Built by operators, not consultants

Hubert W.E. Knapp

Co-Founder · Interim CEO / Chief Strategist

Five decades global banking infrastructure. Co-founded LQID Bank — secured PRA Authorisation With Restrictions + FCA e-money licence. Brings licensed-bank operating experience to QNTM's prudential and regulatory design. Founder Super Vote (Bus Ties) per MoU Schedule A.3.

Hani Massoud

Co-Founder · CTO / Platform Architecture Lead

Four decades core financial infrastructure. LQID Bank co-founder. Leads QNTM dual-rail platform architecture and engineering direction. Founder Super Vote (Tech Ties) per MoU Schedule A.3.

Full founding team (six Founders + Sky Tech Pool + three Founding Employees) at /team.

Diligence access

Qualified institutions, strategic partners, and investors can request architecture discussions, operating model deep-dives, and data-room materials.

Contact investors teamRequest data room

Stakeholder FAQ

Direct answers to the questions that matter for diligence conversations.

What is QNTM?

QNTM is a banking institution in formation and a network operator for regional banks. It is being built to perform compliance, settlement, treasury orchestration, and regulatory reporting through an agent-first dual-rail operating model.

Who is the primary customer?

The primary commercial customer is the partner bank. Institutional principals and developers are secondary audiences who benefit through partner-bank or direct QNTM workflows over time.

What does the partner bank keep?

The bank keeps the licence, balance sheet, customer relationship, brand, credit appetite, and governance authority. QNTM performs the repetitive work underneath.

How is this different from banking software?

Software vendors sell tools that help bank employees work faster. QNTM performs the work directly. The difference is between a copilot and an autopilot: one improves productivity, the other changes the cost architecture.

How is QNTM different from a crypto company?

QNTM is not an exchange or speculative crypto platform. Stablecoins are treated as one rail inside a broader bank-grade operating model. The focus is regulated institutional settlement, not retail trading.

What is the revenue model?

Revenue comes from basis points on transaction volume processed, a share of treasury optimisation upside, and fixed compliance-as-a-service fees. This aligns QNTM's revenue with the partner bank's operating savings.

What regulatory authorisations are required?

UK PRA + FCA primary licensing — staged authorisation pathway. Phase 1 is foundational build, pre-application engagement. Phase 2 targets Authorisation With Restrictions and UK production launch. Phase 3 closes federated network onboarding. Built by the team behind LQID Bank (already secured PRA AWR + FCA e-money).

What does a successful first deployment look like?

One partner bank, one tightly scoped use case, one governable rollout perimeter, and one clear proof that the operating model reduces cost and improves control without degrading the bank's franchise.

What is the seed raise for?

Engineering the core operating layer, submitting the EMI application, signing the first partner bank LOI, and building the team to execute the first deployment.

What stage is the company at?

Pre-revenue, pre-licence. Architecture is defined. Company formation is underway. The founding team is in active conversations with prospective partner banks and regulatory advisors.

Begin the architecture conversation.

The best way to evaluate the model is a technical conversation with the founding team. We prefer depth over volume.

Contact leadershipReview the architecture